Statement and Arguments - Expert Level
Practice and master this topic with our carefully crafted questions.
Study the following instructions carefully and then answer the questions that follow.
In making decisions about important questions, it is desirable that a candidate is able to distinguish between 'strong' and 'weak' arguments so far as they relate to the questions.
Each question given below consists of a statement, followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is a 'strong' argument and which is a 'weak' argument.
Give answer:
(A) If only argument I is strong
(B) If only argument II is strong
(C) If either I or II is strong
(D) If neither I nor II is strong and
(E) If both I and II are strong.
Clearly, heath of the citizens is an issue of major concern for the Government . So, a product like drugs, must be first studied and tested in the Indian context before giving licence for its sale . So, only argument I holds strong.
Statement: Are nuclear families better than joint families ?
Assumptions:
(I) Yes. It indicates in them qualities of leadership.
(II) No. They should study and build up their career.
Clearly, with so many people around in a joint family, there is more security. Also, work is shared. So, argument I holds. In nuclear families, there are lesser number of people and so lesser responsibilities and more freedom. Thus II also holds.
Before indulging in new development programme it is much necessary to plan the exact target, policies and their implementation and the allocation of funds which shows the right directions to work. So, argument I holds strong. Also, planning ensures full utilization of available resources and funds and step wise approach towards the target. So, spending a part of money on it is no wastage. Thus argument II is not valid.
Oil, being an essential commodity, out country must keep it in reserve. So, argument I is vague, while argument II holds as it provides a substantial reason for the same.
Statement: Should strikes in the field of education be banned?
Assumptions:
(I) Yes, it is against professional ethics.
(II) Yes, it affect the students adversely.
Strikes are against the professional ethics, also affects the students adversely.