Statement and Arguments - Expert Level
Practice and master this topic with our carefully crafted questions.
Study the following instructions carefully and then answer the questions that follow.
In making decisions about important questions, it is desirable that a candidate is able to distinguish between 'strong' and 'weak' arguments so far as they relate to the questions.
Each question given below consists of a statement, followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is a 'strong' argument and which is a 'weak' argument.
Give answer:
(A) If only argument I is strong
(B) If only argument II is strong
(C) If either I or II is strong
(D) If neither I nor II is strong and
(E) If both I and II are strong.
Clearly, Independent judiciary is necessary for impartial judgement so that the executive does not take wrong measures. So, argument I holds.
Clearly, pesticides are meant to prevent the corps from harmful pests. But at the same time, they get washed away with water and contaminate the groundwater. Thus both the arguments hold strong.
Merit, fair selection and equal opportunities for all - these three factors, if taken care of, can help government recruit competent officials and also fulfill the objective of the Constitution. Thus, both the argument hold strong.
Clearly encourage the young entrepreneurs will open up the field for the establishment of new industries. Thus, it shall help in industrial development and not only employee the entrepreneurs but create more job opportunities for other as well. So, both the arguments hold strong.
Clearly government jobs in rural areas are underlined with several difficulties. In lieu of these, extra incentives are needed. So, only argument I holds strong.
The Constitution of India has laid down the doctrine of 'equality before the law' . So, argument II holds strong. Also, we cannot judge the intentions of a person behind committing a crime. So, argument I is vague.
Clearly, after being in strict discipline and following a formal dress code of the schools for so many years, the students must be granted some liberty in the college life, as they have to take on the responsibilities of life, next, besides, schools adopt uniforms to take care of the security of the child - an aspect which does not matter much in the colleges. So, argument II holds strong. Also, the environment of the college depends on the students' dedication and etiquettes and not on their uniforms . So, argument I is vague.
Making education free for all is not the only means to ensure literacy. An awareness need to be aroused for this. So, argument I is vague. Also, such a step would require immense funds and lead to financial drain. So, argument II holds.
Clearly, the autonomous status of the Doordarshan will be a step towards giving it independence for an impartial coverage. Autonomous status does not mean that the coverage will be decided by a few. So, only argument I holds.
clearly, spending money on sports cannot be avoided merely because it can be spent on socio-economic problems. So, argument I does not hold. Also, if the expenses on sports are curtailed, the sports persons would face lack of facilities and training and our country will lag behind in the international sports competitions. So, II holds.