Statement and Conclusions - Expert Level
Practice and master this topic with our carefully crafted questions.
In each question below is given a statement followed by two conclusions numbered I and II. You have to assume everything in the statement to be true, then consider the two conclusions together and decide which of them logically follows beyond a reasonable doubt from the information given in the statement.
Give answer:
(A) If only conclusion I follows
(B) If only conclusion II follows
(C) If either I or II follows
(D) If neither I nor II follows and
(E) If both I and II follow.
Statements: India's economy is depending mainly on forests.
Conclusions:
I. Trees should be preserved to improve Indian economy.
II. India wants only maintenance of forests to improve economic conditions.
It is mentioned in the statement that India's economy depends mainly on forests. This means that forests should be preserved. So, I follows. But, that only preservation of forests can improve the economy, cannot be said. So, II does not follow.
Clearly, I follows directly from the given statement. However, II is not related to the given statement and so does not follow.
Both I and II directly follow from the given statement.
No other section of society except farmers has been talked about in the statement. So, neither I nor II follows.
Clearly, the Government has taken the step to attract more tourists. So, both I and II follow.
The statement concentrates on the increasing viewership of T.V. and does not stress either on increasing the readership of newspapers or making studies regarding the same. So, neither I nor II follows.
The authenticity of the given statement cannot be deduced. So, I does not follow. Since, the advertisement talks of quick returns, it implies that people want their money to grow, as an advertisement always imbibes comments and features that attract the attention of the people immediately. So, II follows.
Clearly, X will not get the special prize because although he broke the world record, he has found to use unfair means. So, II follow while I does not.
The statement stresses the need to adopt a new method of examination. So, I does not follow. However, II directly follows from the given statement.
Clearly, I follow from the fact that writing makes an exact man. Conclusion II also directly follows from the statement.