Logical Reasoning

Statement and Conclusions - Expert Level

Logical Reasoning Exercise Mode

Statement and Conclusions - Expert Level

Practice and master this topic with our carefully crafted questions.

5 Questions
8 Minutes
0% Completed
QUEST ? !
Directions to Solve

In each question below is given a statement followed by two conclusions numbered I and II. You have to assume everything in the statement to be true, then consider the two conclusions together and decide which of them logically follows beyond a reasonable doubt from the information given in the statement.

Give answer:

(A) If only conclusion I follows

(B) If only conclusion II follows

(C) If either I or II follows

(D) If neither I nor II follows and

(E) If both I and II follow.

Question 41
Statement : The eligibility for admission to the course is minimum second class Master's degree. However, the candidates who have appeared for the final year examination of Master's degree can also apply.

Conclusions : 

I. All candidates who have yet to get their Master's degree will        be there in the list of selected candidates.

II. All candidates having obtained second class Master's degree       will be there in the list of selected candidates.

A
Only conclusion I follows.
B
Only conclusion II follows.
C
Either I or II follows.
D
Neither I nor II follows.
E
Both I and II follow.
Correct Answer: Option D

The statement mentions that the candidates who have obtained second class Master's degree or have appeared for the final year examination of Master's degree, can apply for admission. This implies that both types of candidates may be selected on certain grounds. Thus, some candidates of each type and not all candidates of any one type, may be selected. So, neither I nor II follows.

Question 42
Statement : Quality has a price tag. India is allocating lots of funds to education.

Conclusions : 

I. Quality of education in India would improve soon.
II. Funding alone can enhance quality of education.

A
Only conclusion I follows.
B
Only conclusion II follows.
C
Either I or II follows.
D
Neither I nor II follows.
E
Both I and II follow.
Correct Answer: Option A

According to the statement, funding is necessary to improve quality and India is allocating funds to education. This means that quality of education will improve in India. So, I follows. But funding alone is sufficient to enhance quality, is not true. So, II does not follow.

Question 43
Statement : Modern man influences his destiny by the choice he makes unlike in the past.

Conclusions : 

I. Earlier there were less options available to man.
II. There was no desire in the past to influence the destiny.

A
Only conclusion I follows.
B
Only conclusion II follows.
C
Either I or II follows.
D
Neither I nor II follows.
E
Both I and II follows.
Correct Answer: Option A

Clearly, I directly follows from the statement while II cannot be deduced from it.

Question 44
Statement : It is almost impossible to survive and prosper in this world without sacrificing ethics and morality.

Conclusions : 

I. World appreciates some concepts but may not uphold it.
II. Concept of ethics and morality are not practicable in life.

A
Only conclusion I follows.
B
Only conclusion II follows.
C
Either I or II follows
D
Neither I nor II follows.
E
Both I and II follows.
Correct Answer: Option B

Clearly, I is vague and so does follow. However ,II directly follows from the given statement.

Question 45
Statement : In India, more emphasis should be placed on areas such agriculture, engineering and technology instead of basic and pure sciences.

Conclusions : 

I.India has achieved sufficient progress in basic and pure sciences.
II. in the past , the productivity factor in our economy was neglected.

A
Only conclusion I follows.
B
Only conclusion II follows.
C
Either I or II follows.
D
Neither I nor II follows.
E
Both I and II follows.
Correct Answer: Option B

That more emphasis should be laid on productivity areas instead of sciences does not means that the country has achieved sufficient progress in sciences. But it implies that productivity factor was previously being neglected. So, II follows while I does not.