Statement and Conclusions - Expert Level
Practice and master this topic with our carefully crafted questions.
In each question below is given a statement followed by two conclusions numbered I and II. You have to assume everything in the statement to be true, then consider the two conclusions together and decide which of them logically follows beyond a reasonable doubt from the information given in the statement.
Give answer:
(A) If only conclusion I follows
(B) If only conclusion II follows
(C) If either I or II follows
(D) If neither I nor II follows and
(E) If both I and II follow.
The workers in the organized sector are not being talked about in the statement. So, I does not follow. It is mentioned that some workers in the unorganized sector are engaged in sundry jobs. This means that they have fixed income. So, II follows.
The popularity of Ayurvedic or allopathic medicines in India is not being talked about in the statement. So, neither I nor II follows.
Clearly, the solution to the problem is not to close down the Municipal and Zila-Parished-run schools but to strive to improve the standard of education of these schools. So, only I follows while II does not.
Clearly, nothing about 'other things' is mentioned in the statement. So, I does not follow. Also, since it is mentioned that programmes and magazines for women are stuffed with kitchen recipes and other household hints. it means that women have special interest in these areas. So, II follows.
Since the given statement talks of an order not to let the officers read newspapers during office hours, It implies that reading newspapers during office hours is undesirable. So, I does not follow. Also, the order has been issued with an intention to prevent harm to office work due to officers' of her indulgences. Thus, II also does not follow.
The statement does not talk against the auction but only speaks of response it received from the bidders and gold producers. So, I does not follow. The phrase 'Plenty of bidders looking for a bargain' is quite contrary to II. So, II also does not follow.
According to the statement, the political prisoners can be divided into two group - those who were released and those who were put in jail for political dharnas. However, no person involved in murder was released. This means that no political prisoner had committed murder. So, I follows. Clearly, II is not directly related to the statement and does not follow.
Investment in securities involves risk. This does not mean that one should not invest in securities. So, I does not follow. Since the statement advises one to consult investment advisor before investing, so II follows.
Both I and II directly follows from the given statement.
The Statement implies that the government is continuously making efforts to curb terrorism, but it still continues to prevail. Thus, I follows while II does not.