Statement and Conclusions - Base Level 1
Practice and master this topic with our carefully crafted questions.
In each question below is given a statement followed by two conclusions numbered I and II. You have to assume everything in the statement to be true, then consider the two conclusions together and decide which of them logically follows beyond a reasonable doubt from the information given in the statement.
Give answer:
(A) If only conclusion I follows
(B) If only conclusion II follows
(C) If either I or II follows
(D) If neither I nor II follows and
(E) If both I and II follow.
Both I and II directly follow from the statement.
Nothing about the growth of economy is mentioned in the statement. So, I does not follow. Also, it is given that 35 per cent of national income is shared by 10 per cent of households. This indicates unequal distribution. So, II follows.
The statement asserts that 25 independent M. L. A.s shall join one party only. Thus, they may join XYZ or any other party. So, either I or II follows.
The statement clearly implies that it is easier to say than to do something and what people say is different from what they do. So,both I and II follows.
The statement mentioned that the world for a man is as he makes it himself, So, some people might find it good and some quite bad. Thus, both I and II follow.
Since the new system gives the students the options of dropping science and mathematics, so students weak in these subjects can also be admitted. So, I follows. Also, it is mentioned that the new system will come into effect from the next academic year. This means it didn't exist previously. So, II also follow.
The cause of revolution cannot be deduced from the given statement. So, I does not follow. However, the statement mentions that Industrial Revolution brought about modern age . This means that revolution overhauls society. So, II follows.
Clearly, I directly follows form the given statement. also, it is mentioned that old ideas are replaced by new ones, as thinking changes with the progressing time. So, II does not follow.
The statement talks of 'adversity' in general and not 'lack of money'. So, I does not follow. II correctly explains the statement and hence it follows.
The statement assets that a good singer always has a sweet voice and only good singers are invited in the conference. This implies that all those invited in the conference have sweet voice and those who do not have sweet voice are not invited. So, both I and II follow.