Statement and Conclusions - Base Level 1
Practice and master this topic with our carefully crafted questions.
In each question below is given a statement followed by two conclusions numbered I and II. You have to assume everything in the statement to be true, then consider the two conclusions together and decide which of them logically follows beyond a reasonable doubt from the information given in the statement.
Give answer:
(A) If only conclusion I follows
(B) If only conclusion II follows
(C) If either I or II follows
(D) If neither I nor II follows and
(E) If both I and II follow.
Statements: Women's organisations in India have welcomed the amendment of the Industrial Employment Rules 1946 to curb sexual harassment at the work place.
Conclusions:
I. Sexual harassment of women at work place is more prevalent in India as compared to other developed countries.
II. Many organisations in India will stop recruiting women to avoid such problems.
The fact that a certain rule has been more welcomed in a certain country does not imply that the problem is more prevalent there. So, I does not follow. Also, the amendment seeks to discourage only sexual harassment of women and shall in no way discourage employment of women. So, II also does not follow.
According to the statement, tenders are invited from contractors experienced in executing construction jobs. So, conclusion I follows. The availability of competent tenders in construction is not mentioned. So, conclusion II does not follow.
The manager might have humiliated Sachin not because of his dislike but on account of certain negligence or mistake on his part. So, I does not follows. Also, nothing about Sachin's rapport with his colleagues can be deduced from the statement. So. II also does not follow.
Since the hospital has started the activity, it must have been well-equipped for the same. So, I follows. Also, any new activity is is started keeping in mind the need for it. So, II also follows.
The use of the 'milk glut' makes I implicit. Also. the fact that the cooperatives and Government dairies failed to use the available milk indicates that they lack the proper infrastructure to handle such quantities of milk. So, II also follows.
Nothing about the relation between political freedom and democracy is mentioned in the statement. So, I does not follow. But II directly follows from the given statement.
The statement implies that people are inclined towards giving their children good education. So, only II follows while I does not.
The need for separate rating agency for IT companies clearly indicates that such assessment requires a separate a set of skills. So, I follows. However, the statement indicates only the need or demand and neither the future course of action nor its after- effects can be judged. So, II does not follow.
The fact given in I is quite contrary to the given statement. So, I does not follow. II mentions the direct implications of the state discussed in the statement. Thus , II follows.
Since the company has been working in this area for three decades, it must have the necessary expertise and infrastructure required in this field. So, I does not follow. However, the qualities that have made the Company X successful in this field have not been mentioned. So, II also does not follow.