Statement and Conclusions - Base Level 1
Practice and master this topic with our carefully crafted questions.
In each question below is given a statement followed by two conclusions numbered I and II. You have to assume everything in the statement to be true, then consider the two conclusions together and decide which of them logically follows beyond a reasonable doubt from the information given in the statement.
Give answer:
(A) If only conclusion I follows
(B) If only conclusion II follows
(C) If either I or II follows
(D) If neither I nor II follows and
(E) If both I and II follow.
It is mentioned asserts that 25 independent M. L. A .s shall join one party only. Thus buying a product should buy the product of company X. So, both I and II follow.
The statement declares enactment of OAS as the direct cause of increase in corruption. So, I follows. However, enactment of an act by a government is undertaken for betterment and not with the intention of encouraging corruption though whatever may be outcome later on.. So, II does not follow.
According to the statement, only those who tackle situations bravely achieve success. So, I follows. However, II is vague with regard to the given statement and so does not follow.
According to the statement, only those who tackle situations bravely achieve success. So, I follows. However, II is vague with regard to the given statement and so does not follow.
It is mentioned in the statement that a neurotic is a person who behaves stupidly. So, I follows. The behavior of normal persons cannot be deduced from the given statement. So, II does not follow.
II. People cannot eat vegetables.
The availability of vegetables is not mentioned in the given statement. So, I does not follow. Also, II is not directly related to the statement and so it also does not follow.
Clearly. the appeal has been made keeping in mind the fact that it would create awareness and have some effect. So, i follows. However, the statement talks of a general appeal and not stringent directions. So, II does not follow.
The Commissioner only cites examples of cities X and Y and undertakes to beautify city Z. This does not imply that he has worked in cities X and Y. So, I does not follow. Also, nothing about people's response to the state of city can be deduced from the statement. Thus, II also does not follow.
The statement clearly mentions that fulfilling criteria and submitting the application before the stipulated date are both essential to avoid rejection. So, I follows. Also, since it is given that the candidates whose applications are rejected shall not be called for written test, so II also follows.
It is mentioned in the statement that India's economy depends mainly on forests. This means that forests should be preserved. So, I follows. But, that only preservation of forests can improve the economy, cannot be said. So, II does not follow.