Statement and Conclusions - Base Level 1
Practice and master this topic with our carefully crafted questions.
In each question below is given a statement followed by two conclusions numbered I and II. You have to assume everything in the statement to be true, then consider the two conclusions together and decide which of them logically follows beyond a reasonable doubt from the information given in the statement.
Give answer:
(A) If only conclusion I follows
(B) If only conclusion II follows
(C) If either I or II follows
(D) If neither I nor II follows and
(E) If both I and II follow.
Pakistan's ability to manufacture arms is not being talked about in the statement. So, I does not follow. The fact in II cannot be mentioned in the statement. So, II also does not follow.
The fact that a certain rule has been more welcomed in a certain country does not imply that the problem is more prevalent there. So, I does not follow. Also, the amendment seeks to discourage only sexual harassment of women and shall in no way discourage employment of women. So, II also does not follow.
Clearly, the statement stresses on the fact that heeding to national needs is much more important than space research programmes , which stray the concerned authorities from the former. So, both I and II follow.
The phrase 'only book' in the statement makes II implicit. However, nothing about the state of poverty before 1950 can be she deduced from the statement. So, I does not follow.
The statement asserts that people cannot stand any particular trend for long and seek change quite often. So, only II follow.
The statement mentioned that chances of heart ailments are greatly reduced by a regular half-hour exercise. So, I follows. However, it talks of only reducing the probability which does not mean that person involved in sedentary jobs shall definitely suffer from heart ailments. So, II does not follow.
Since the accident has caused concern, it must be fatal. So, I follows. The use of the word 'again' in the statement justifies the fact mentioned in II. So, II also follows.
The phrase not much has been done in this field'indicates that wind energy is a comparatively newly emerging field.So, I follows. The expression 'there is vast potential for developing wind as thinking changes with the progressing time. So, II does not follow.
The decision to withdraw subsidy has clearly been taken to compensate for the loss and not because people can now afford to pay more for cooking gas. So, I does not follow. Also, the statement talks of withdrawing 33% of the prevailing subsidy and not of reducing 33% of the actual price. So, II also does not follow.
Both the given conclusions clearly bring out the central theme of the proverb given in the statement. So, both I and II follow.