Let us Practice - All Latest Questions
Practice and master this topic with our carefully crafted questions.
Each question given below consists of a statement, followed by three or four arguments numbered I, II, III and IV. You have to decide which of the arguments is/are 'strong' arguments) and which is/are 'weak' arguments) and accordingly choose your answer from the alternatives given below each question.
In an organization, what matter most is productivity and to ensure productivity, the organization needs to have effective managers and innovative, devoted and hard working employees. Thus, the capability of the individuals should be the only criterion for promotion. So, only argument I holds strong, while II and III do not.
Reducing the number of holidays just because no other country gives so many holidays or it is a feature of certain system which we have renounced, does not seem convincing. So, neither I nor II holds strong. However, this step would surely help to reduce the backlog of pending cases and dispense with the new cases much more quickly than before. So, III holds strong. Even if the holidays are reduced, only the avoidable or seemingly unnecessary ones shall be cut short and the national holidays shall still remain to enjoy. So, IV also does not hold.
Clearly, banning a product would surely render jobless the large number of workers involving in manufacturing it. Besides, firecrackers on burning produce explosive sounds and immense poisonous fumes, which cause both air and noise pollution. So, both argument I and III hold. However, to stop child labor, it is necessary to close down the industry but stricts law against child abuse should be enforced and legal actions taken. Similarly, there are many other ways to make parties boisterous and special events enjoyable. Hence, II as well as IV does not hold strong.
The government cannot sell off public sector units just to pool up funds for development. Besides, if it does so, these units shall be handed over to private comanies which are fully equipped to run these units effectively. So, neither I nor II holds strong. privatization shall surely ensure better services. but private companies adopt hire and free policy and they are free to terminate the services of any employee as and when they wish to. Thus, both III and IV hold strong.
Clearly, strike is not a means of indiscipline but only a practice in which the workers exercise their fundamental right to voice their protest against the atrocities of the management. So, argument I is vague while II holds. Also, the option of resorting to strikes often aggravates petty issues and disrupts work for long periods, thus affecting productivity. So, III also holds strong.