Statement and Assumptions Statement and Assumptions - Practice Level

The phrase budgetary provision for the purpose of appointing additional faculty makes I implicit. Also, since no budgetary provision was provided for appointment of faculty in view of certain changed financial priorities. it means that some other issues require more financial attention. So, II is also implicit.

The statement talks of 'increasing demands' of consumers. It does not imply that consumers were indifferent to price and quality earlier. So, I is not implicit. Besides, the statement mentions that increasing competitiveness has made available to consumers a wide variety of options which has led them to comparing things and choosing the one which best suits their requirement and budget. They are thus getting better 'value for their money'. So, II is also not implicit.

The forest shall be visited to increase the knowledge of natural resources. This means that forests abound in natural resources. So, I is implicit. The children are being taken to forests to help them learn more practically. So, II is also implicit.

Clearly, computer education can be started at the school level only if it is easy. So, I is implicit. In the statement, nothing is mentioned about the link between jobs and computer education. So, II is not implicit.

Since Sachin has asked his brother to collect the form, it is evident that the university may issue the form to anybody and that Sachin's brother would receive the letter before the last date of collecting the form. So, both I and II are implicit.

Clearly, the comparison could not be made without knowing the sale of all the radio sets. So, I is implicit. The state mentions only that the sale is largest and nothing is mentioned about the manufacture. So, II is not implicit.

The fact that shalini has applied for a loan of Rs. 1,80,000 implies that the bank can grant a loan above Rs. 1,00,000. So, I is implicit. II also follows directly from the statement and so is implicit.

The statement clearly warns the visitors to beware of dogs as they are trained to welcome the guests and intruders differently. So, II is implicit. I is vague and hence, it is not implicit.

The statement point out that a person who keeps his things locked away shall feel that every person is good because he has no danger for his things. So, I is implicit. The statement mentions nothing about the lawful nature of the act of stealing. So, II is not implicit.

The statement expresses a doubt at the non - depiction of the village in a map which was said to be an 'official' one. So, both I and II are implicit.