| 1. |
Statement : Should individuals/institutes having treasures of national significance like Nobel prizes, hand them over to the Central Government for their safe custody ? Arguments : I. Yes. The individuals or institutions do not have enough resources to protect them. II. No. These are the property of the individuals /institutions who win them and should be in their custody. |
|||||||||
Answer: Option B Explanation: Clearly, the awards are given for individual excellence and perfection. So, only argument II holds strong. |
Study the following instructions carefully and then answer the questions that follow.
In making decisions about important questions, it is desirable that a candidate is able to distinguish between 'strong' and 'weak' arguments so far as they relate to the questions.
Each question given below consists of a statement, followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is a 'strong' argument and which is a 'weak' argument.
Give answer:
(A) If only argument I is strong
(B) If only argument II is strong
(C) If either I or II is strong
(D) If neither I nor II is strong and
(E) If both I and II are strong.
Post your comments here:
Name *:
Email : (optional)
Your comments will be displayed only after manual approval.