| 1. |
Statement: Should the vehicles older than 15 years be rejected in metros in India ? Arguments: (I) Yes. this is a significant step to lower down the pollution level in metros. (II) No. It will be very difficult for vehicle owners to shift to other parts in country because they will not get suitable job for their very existence. |
|||||||||
Answer: Option A Explanation: Clearly, 15 year old vehicles are not Euro - complaint and hence cause much more pollution then the recent ones. So, argument I holds. Argument II is vague since owners of these vehicles need to shift themselves. They might sell of their vehicles and buy new ones - a small price which every citizen can afford for a healthy environment. |
Study the following instructions carefully and then answer the questions that follow.
In making decisions about important questions it is desirable that a candidate is able to distinguish between 'strong' and 'weak' arguments so far as they relate to the questions.
'Weak' arguments may not be directly related to the questions and may be of minor importance or may be related to the trivial aspect of the question.
Each question below is followed by two arguments I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is a 'strong' argument and which is a 'weak' argument.
Give Answer
(a) Only argument I is strong
(b) Only argument II is strong
(c) Either I or II is strong
(d) Neither I nor II is strong
(e) Both I and II are strong
Post your comments here:
Name *:
Email : (optional)
Your comments will be displayed only after manual approval.