| 1. |
Statement: Should all the annual examinations up to Std. V be abolished ? Arguments: (I) Yes. The young students should not be burdened with examinations which hampers their natural growth. (II) No. The students will not study seriously as they will get automatic promotion to the next class and this will affect them in them future. |
|||||||||
Answer: Option E Explanation: Clearly, neither the students can be burdened with studies at such a tender age, nor can they be left free to take studies casually, as this shall weaken their basic foundation. So, both the argument follow. |
Study the following instructions carefully and then answer the questions that follow.
In making decisions about important questions it is desirable that a candidate is able to distinguish between 'strong' and 'weak' arguments so far as they relate to the questions.
'Weak' arguments may not be directly related to the questions and may be of minor importance or may be related to the trivial aspect of the question.
Each question below is followed by two arguments I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is a 'strong' argument and which is a 'weak' argument.
Give Answer
(a) Only argument I is strong
(b) Only argument II is strong
(c) Either I or II is strong
(d) Neither I nor II is strong
(e) Both I and II are strong
Post your comments here:
Name *:
Email : (optional)
Your comments will be displayed only after manual approval.