| 1. |
statement : Should the parliamentary elections in India be held every three years as against five years at present ? Arguments : I. No. This will enhance wastage of money and resources . II. Yes. This will help the voters to change non-performing representatives without much delay. III. No. The elected representatives will not have enough time to settle and concentrate on developmental activities. |
|||||||||
Answer: Option D Explanation: The election process entails exorbitant expenditure. So, holding elections very often will surely lead to wastage of money and resources. Thus, I holds strong. Also, the elected representatives need a considerable period of time to implement their policies and also convince the voters of their working. So. III holds strong while II does not. |
Each question given below consists of a statement, followed by three or four arguments numbered I, II, III and IV. You have to decide which of the arguments is/are 'strong' arguments) and which is/are 'weak' arguments) and accordingly choose your answer from the alternatives given below each question.
Post your comments here:
Name *:
Email : (optional)
Your comments will be displayed only after manual approval.