| 1. |
Statement : Should there be complete ban on manufacture and use of firecrackers ? Arguments : I. No. This will render thousands of workers jobless. II. Yes. The firecracker manufacturers use child labor to a large extent. III. Yes. This will be a concrete step to reduce noise and air pollution. IV. No. Use of firecrackers makes certain special occassions more lively and joyful. |
|||||||||
Answer: Option B Explanation: Clearly, banning a product would surely render jobless the large number of workers involving in manufacturing it. Besides, firecrackers on burning produce explosive sounds and immense poisonous fumes, which cause both air and noise pollution. So, both argument I and III hold. However, to stop child labor, it is necessary to close down the industry but stricts law against child abuse should be enforced and legal actions taken. Similarly, there are many other ways to make parties boisterous and special events enjoyable. Hence, II as well as IV does not hold strong. |
Each question given below consists of a statement, followed by three or four arguments numbered I, II, III and IV. You have to decide which of the arguments is/are 'strong' arguments) and which is/are 'weak' arguments) and accordingly choose your answer from the alternatives given below each question.
Post your comments here:
Name *:
Email : (optional)
Your comments will be displayed only after manual approval.