| 1. |
Statement : Should the rule of wearing helmet for both driver and pillion rider while driving a motor bike be enforced strictly ? Arguments : I. Yes. It is a rule s should be followed strictly by all. II. No. Each individual knows how to protect his own life and it should be left to his discretion. III. No. It does not ensure safety as only the head is protected and rest of the body is not. IV. Yes. It is a necessity as head, being the most sensitive organ, is protected by the helmet. |
|||||||||
Answer: Option C Explanation: Clearly, the rule has been devised for the safety of two-wheeler riders, as majority of two-wheeler accidents result in direct fall of the rider,leading to head injury and finally death. And the objective of a rule cannot be fulfilled until it is following by all and this requires strict enforcement. Thus, both I and IV hold strong, while III does not. Besides, it is the basic duty of the Government to look after the safety of the citizens and it ought not leave it to the discretion of the individuals.So, argument II does not hold strong. |
Each question given below consists of a statement, followed by three or four arguments numbered I, II, III and IV. You have to decide which of the arguments is/are 'strong' arguments) and which is/are 'weak' arguments) and accordingly choose your answer from the alternatives given below each question.
Post your comments here:
Name *:
Email : (optional)
Your comments will be displayed only after manual approval.