1. |
Statement : Should administrative officers be transferred after one or two years ? Arguments : I. Yes. They get friendly with local people and are manipulated by them. II. No. By the time their policies and schemes start taking shape, they have to leave. III. No. This will create a lot of administrative hassles and cause a lot of inconvenience to the officers. |
|||||||||
Answer: Option C Explanation: Clearly the acquaintance of administrative officers with the local people poses no harm. So, argument I is vague. However, both II and III hold strong, because making transfer too often would neither give them enough time to settle down comfortably in a new place, nor enable them to formulate and implement their policies in toto. This would also be administratively impossible. |
Each question given below consists of a statement, followed by three or four arguments numbered I, II, III and IV. You have to decide which of the arguments is/are 'strong' arguments) and which is/are 'weak' arguments) and accordingly choose your answer from the alternatives given below each question.
Post your comments here:
Name *:
Email : (optional)
Your comments will be displayed only after manual approval.