LearnFrenzy
Sign in Take a free test

Analyzing Arguments · Discussion forum

Analyzing Arguments - Type 2 Question 7 – answer, explanation & discussion

  • 0 comments
  • Answer explained
  • Moderated community
Question 7 Back to Exercise

The Fourth Amendment to the Constitution protects citizens against unreasonable searches and seizures. No search of a person's home or personal effects may be conducted without a written search warrant issued on probable cause. This means that a neutral judge must approve the factual basis justifying a search before it can be conducted.
This paragraph best supports the statement that the police cannot search a person's home or private papers unless they have

  • A legal authorization Correct
  • B direct evidence of a crime.
  • C read the person his or her constitutional rights.
  • D a reasonable belief that a crime has occurred.
  • E requested that a judge be present.
Correct Answer: Option A

The second and third sentence combine to give support to choice a. The statement stresses that there must be a judge's approval (i.e., legal authorization) before a search can be conducted. Choices b and d are wrong because it is not enough for the police to have direct evidence or a reasonable belief—a judge must authorize the search for it to be legal. Choices c and e are not mentioned in the passage.

Discussion & Comments 0

Share your method, a shortcut, or ask about a step you didn't follow.

No comments yet. Be the first to share your solution!

Post your comment

Comments appear after a quick review by our team.

Search LearnFrenzy

Esc

Quick links